Donald Trump and John Kelly |
We’re
all Civil War re-enactors. As the most
dramatic and consequential chapter in our tortured racial history it compels
our concern and provokes our passions. But we seem unable to deal with it
maturely. Instead of facing it and learning from it, we succumb to its
distortions and lies. Instead of settling it, it unsettles us. We fight it
every single day, and it always wins. And on October 30, White House Chief of
Staff, General John Kelly recklessly threw himself into that fight, responding to
a question about Civil War monuments by saying:
I would tell you that
Robert E. Lee was an honorable man. He was a man that gave up his country to
fight for his state, which 150 years ago was more important than country. It
was always loyalty to state first back in those days. Now where it’s different
today. But the lack of the ability to compromise led to the Civil War and men
and women of good faith on both sides made their stand with where their
consciences had them make their stand.
But
this is monumentally foolish. The
entire history of the American republic before the Civil War is one of endless compromises aimed at
reassuring the South that slavery would not be disturbed. The precipitating
cause of the war was the election of a profoundly conciliatory and compromising
president who merely wished to prevent the expansion of slavery into new
territories, and promised to leave it alone in the states where it already existed. We compromised our ideals for decades, but
that ultimately proved incapable of preventing war with people prepared to
fight to the death to maintain such a monstrous evil. And apparently we need to
be reminded that General Lee (who was a gallant soldier, but a brutal slave-master) led an
army intent on destroying the United State in the service of that evil.
But
why do we need to be reminded? How does an intelligent person like Kelly manage
to overlook such glaring truths? The easy
answer from liberals is: deliberate racism. In this
view Kelly finds Confederate generals admirable because they’re the heroes of
white power over black bodies. Maybe he even likes
slavery! But this is cheap and
irresponsible; there is no evidence that beneath Kelly’s bland exterior there
beats a cold racist heart. Indeed, there’s a better, a more subtle explanation,
and it’s the reverse of the liberal accusation. It’s not that Kelly admires men
like Lee because of their white supremacy; it’s that he goes easy on their
white supremacy because he admires them. And he admires them because it’s too painful
not to. That is, to admit Lee’s evil is to admit American evil and that’s something a
conservative can never do. Slavery and racism are central to the
American story, and the inability to
accept that is central to American conservatism.
And
what’s true for Kelly is true for the millions more – in the South and
elsewhere – who perceive the Civil War in the same way. Some of them are indeed
motivated by outright racism, but most are simply unable to concede that
America committed such grievous crimes. It’s probably true that most people in
most countries are similarly unable to face up to their
own national sins. But Americans find it particularly painful,
since we invest such emotion in the view of ourselves as noble and enlightened
crusaders fighting for democracy and truth. How can the shining city on the hill have a rotten
foundation? Downplaying American racial
sin to preserve American idealistic self-image is older than the republic
itself.
Rutherford B. Hayes, who ascended to the presidency in 1877 by agreeing to a backroom deal that ended the federal guarantee of the rights of African Americans |
It’s
because the Civil War presents a direct threat to that self-image that we continue
to fight over it so bitterly. And in
the period after the war, known as Reconstruction, we dug
ourselves deeper. When the South lost it faced a profound moral choice: either concede
the horrible wrongness of its war aims, or preserve its self-image by pretending
it fought for other more respectable reasons, and by suppressing the ex-slaves
as lesser creatures whose rights need not be respected. We all know what it chose. And, crucially, it
asked the rest of the country to share its mythology. Or rather,
it demanded widespread acceptance of
that mythology as the price for white reconciliation. In
effect, southern whites presented northern whites with a choice of their own,
“Side with us or with our ex-slaves; you can’t have both.” And we all know what
they chose. The mythology became the consensus, and black Americans paid the
price.
Kelly,
and the millions who agree with him, are still making that same choice. They callously
disregard and minimize the death and destruction visited upon black people
under slavery, Jim Crow, and even now, all to preserve white unity and white
pride. But unsurprisingly, callousness is not a constructive strategy. It’s
what impels conservative denial about the continuing harsh reality of black
life in America today. It pushes whites toward white identity politics, even
white nationalism, even outright racism. Its suppressed guilt makes
conservatives bitter, defensive, resentful, angry. It allows them to be manipulated by
malevolent hucksters like Donald Trump. Conservative denial is the very poison
that is killing us.
But
liberals are immune because they’ve opted out of the old consensus. That’s what
makes them liberals! Starting in the 1950’s and 60’s they determined to expand the
New Deal economic and social success story – which had until then been limited
to whites – to include all Americans. In
effect they rejected the white southern Reconstruction-era choice as a false one
and determined to side with everyone. But
southern and conservative whites refused – even at this late a stage – to
honestly face their historical and current crimes, and liberals, in frustration
and desperation, gave up the project of shared prosperity. After the Civil War, northern whites
reconciled with southern whites and blacks suffered. But now white liberals side with blacks and reconciliation
suffers. We’re all Reconstruction re-enactors.
But
that’s partly because liberal reluctance to surrender American unity has turned
into wild-eyed enthusiasm. Liberals are
happy to see themselves as the good guys, the protectors and allies of black
people, and even happier to see conservatives – particularly southern white
conservatives – as the embodiment of all American evil. Increasingly, liberals
see America itself as so essentially
compromised by racial evil that
anyone would be foolish and naive to bestow upon her any hope or
loyalty. But liberal racial sanctimony, like conservative racial denial, is
really about unresolved guilt, about attempting to remove oneself from American
sin. Conservatives childishly pretend it doesn’t exist; liberals face it but project
it entirely onto the political Other. Conservatives hold onto American idealism
by denying it’s less than ideal, liberals hold onto it by psychologically and politically
removing themselves from America. The liberal response is more forgivable, of
course, since they do face the truth, and they do hold onto their idealism. But
they do so at the cost of alienation from their own country, that is, from
themselves. And that detachment makes it too easy to indulge the darker aspects
of that idealism and go crusading against conservatives like Puritan ministers railing
against Satan. But unsurprisingly, shaming is not a constructive
strategy. But it is an inevitable one when you’ve concluded that
the only way to hold onto your idealism is by rebuking your own country.
And
that’s how we’ve hardened into our two sad, familiar camps, defined by our
respective dysfunctional reactions to the horrible contradiction between our
national ideals and our national crimes. But callous denial and aloof
sanctimony are not our only options. The
only hope, and it’s a slim one, is for liberals to see the damage they do when
they so fundamentally deplore their fellow countrymen. Liberals, as the
conscience of America, must be the more mature party here. If they can face up
to American sin, can’t they face up to their own? It’s true that many
conservatives are still outright racist, but most are not, and
calling them all racists and labeling them as essentially evil does enormous
harm to our national life. It degrades the discourse and increases mistrust and
resentment, it hardens people in
their resistance. It
confuses the symptom, racial resentment, with the disease, national pride, and
it angers people who simply want to believe in themselves and their country. It
plays into the hands of white nationalists and unscrupulous politicians. Conservatives
have foolishly conflated believing in America with believing America has never really done anything wrong, and they
badly need to educate themselves on the distinction. Many, out of stubbornness
or animus or ignorance, never will. But many
could, and liberals need to give them the space to do so.
And
as liberals, the only effective way we can educate is by example. We can do all
three things at once: hold onto our ideals, squarely face our country’s sins, and
honestly accept that they’re our
sins, that we’re inextricably American too. Honest judgment of American history
will never get a fair hearing if it’s not joined to a deep commitment to America
itself, since no one will hear criticism from someone they don’t trust. And we
can be a little more forgiving of those who find it so difficult to hear. If liberals cannot transcend their own
misunderstandings, if they cannot graduate to a more mature and constructive engagement
with our terrible history, if they can’t accept that redeeming America means redeeming actual Americans, and if they can’t
meet them as equals and as fellow Americans – if they can’t do all this they won’t
be honestly addressing our deepest problems; they’ll only be perpetuating them.